Economics Roundtable

Job Losses - I

This graph all too clearly illusttrates the current situation.


Job Losses - II

U.S. payroll employment is now almost 300,000 jobs below the worst month in the previous recession.

After a massive downward revision in the past year's payroll employment figures, the total for January 2010 is 129,527,000. The minimum payroll employment in the previous recession was 129,822,00 for August 2003.


Click on the chart for a larger version.


A Positive Number

The revised November change in U.S. payroll employment is +4,000. This is the first positive number since December 2007. Positive is good.

The other side of the coin is that December 2009 payroll employment was 130,910,000. December 1999 payroll employment was 130.532,000. The increase of 378,000 jobs in 10 years is not so good. The labor force increased by 12,882,000 over the same period.


A Troubling Chart

The chart below shows percentage changes in U.S. payroll employment over the previous ten years.
 

Click on the chart for a larger version.

If payroll employment does not increase for January and February, payroll employment for February 2010 will be less than payroll employment for February 2000.

The chart below shows percentage changes in U.S. payroll employment (blue) and civilian labor force (red) over the previous ten years.
 

Click on the chart for a larger version.


Good Economics

Bruce Yandle lists the reasons why Cash for Clunkers is a Loser. Among other things, it is the latest example of The Broken Window Fallacy, which was clearly explained by Frederick Bastiat, 1801-1850.

James Hamilton gives a clear explanation of why comparing the level of government debt in 1945 to the projected level of government debt in ten years is not comforting, but is downright scary.

Gregory Mankiw neatly explains the "third factor" consideration in the difference between correlation and causation. Paul Krugman adds a comment, and Mankiw responds.


100%

The Economics Roundtable includes 100% of the Wall Street Journal's Top 25 Economics Blogs plus 120 more.


No Ads!

David Warsh explains why Mark Thoma does not take ads at Economist's View and adds insightful commentary on economics bloggers.


Thinking About Jobs

Jeff Frankel lays out a balanced view of the current employment statistics.

Last Month: Jeff Frankel says that the labor market has NOT yet signalled a turning point. Check the graph of weekly hours at the bottom of the page.


Clive Granger, 1934-2009

We have lost an original thinker of the first magnitude. Clive W. J. Granger.


Auctions and Politicians

Catch up on the background for one of the newest areas of Economics Engineering.


The Clark Medal: A Hindcast

David Warsh identifies the likely winners of the John Bates Clark Medal for even-numbered years. The award has, of course, been announced only in odd-numbered years. Who did we miss?


Why Card Issuers Engage In Rate-Jacking

Adam Levitin of Credit Slips explains another "benefit" of securitization. The economics of this market structure are stunningly bad.


The Geithner Plan

Will it work? Paul Krugman says no.
The New York Times' Room for Debate includes Simon Johnson, Brad DeLong, and Mark Toma.


Equilibrium and Meltdown

George Waters addresses the economic crisis and the state of macroeconomics.


Gzing! Gzing! Gzing!

David Warsh offers a fascinating account of the invention of earmarks. Catch his review of So Damn Much Money: The Triumph of Lobbying and the Corrosion of American Government, by Robert G. Kaiser.


VoxEU -- Free Online Book

Rescuing our jobs and savings: What G7/8 leaders can do to solve the global credit crisis -- Contents Page

Richard Baldwin, Barry Eichengreen

"Without rapid and coordinated action by G7/8 leaders, this financial crisis could turn into a jobs crisis, a pension crisis and much more. This column introduces a collection of essays by leading economists on what the G7/8 leaders should do this weekend. The dozen essays present a remarkable consensus on a few points: we need immediate, coordinated global action that includes recapitalisation of the banks."


Economic Principals

Congratulations to David Warsh on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of EP.


The First Global Financial Crisis
of the 21st Century

A VoxEU.org Publication

Edited by Andrew Felton and Carmen Reinhart

Download the book.

Read the announcement
and/or download selected chapters.

Review: the topic itself is important, but this book also marks a new direction for online discussion.


Great Articles by Famous Economists

The Library of Economics and Liberty includes The Concise Encyclopeida of Economics. To see how many well-known economists have contributed browse by category .


EconModel

The Economics Roundtable is sponsored by EconModel.

The Classic Economic Models cover micro, macro, and financial markets.


RSS Feed

Causes of the Crisis

"Here, the authors of articles in Critical Review’s special issue on the causes of the financial crisis blog about their latest thoughts and findings regarding ‘what went wrong.’”


February 16, 2010, 12:34 pm, 650993
The key to understanding the "Basel thesis" about the cause of the crisis, advanced in Critical Review's special issue on the crisis by coauthors Viral Acharya & Matthew Richardson, and by coauthors Juliusz Jablecki & Mateusz Machaj, as well as by Wladimir Kraus and me in our forthcoming


February 13, 2010, 12:34 pm, 649821
Ironically, Cafe Hayek takes issue with my Austrian claim that bankers were (in general) ignorant of the risks they were taking, hence could not have been taking these risks due to their knowledge that they were "too big to fail" and thus would be bailed out. Or at least ...


February 11, 2010, 8:34 pm, 649035
Bill Woolsey draws attention in the comments to the Austrian emphasis on malinvestment, as opposed to the mainstream preoccupation with aggregate investment levels.

What do I know?--I'm not an economist--but that certainly does seem like an important theoretical contribution.

But is it a contribution to understanding the ...


February 11, 2010, 2:34 pm, 648803
The most shocking result of having researched the causes of the financial crisis for the last year and a half is this discovery: economists have no compunctions about answering empirical questions, such as what caused the specific crisis of 2008, with general theoretical models, whether macro- or micro- in nature, ...


February 11, 2010, 2:34 pm, 648802
For what it is worth, here is Wladimir's and my response to the new consensus: "A Silver Lining to the Financial Crisis: A More Realistic Understanding of Capitalism." In it, we move from a rebuttal of the Corporate Compensation Myth to an explanation of the homogenizing effect of capital ...


February 11, 2010, 12:34 pm, 648724
It has been a long while since anyone has posted here. One reason is that the creative frenzy of last year, in which many different ideas about the financial crisis were debated, has lapsed into a hegemonic consensus about the causes of the crisis (see next post), so there hasn't ...


January 11, 2010, 6:34 pm, 628420
Testimony of David Colander submitted to the Congress of the United States, House Science and Technology Committee, for the Hearing on “The Risks of Financial Modeling: VaR and the Economic Meltdown,” September 10, 2009

Mr. Chairman and members of the committee: I thank you for the opportunity to ...


January 11, 2010, 6:34 pm, 628421
Paul Krugman has become the voice of economists for many businessmen, politicians, and lay people. Thus, when he writes an article entitled “How did Economists Get It So Wrong?” (The New York Times Magazine, September 6), it’s big news. Over the past week I’ve been continually asked ...


January 11, 2010, 6:34 pm, 628423
Welcome to "Causes of the Crisis." It is an experiment in scholarly discourse using what is usually the worst venue for careful discussion--the blog.

The Critical Review Foundation, the nonprofit foundation that is the blog's sponsor, hopes to encourage reflection on what caused the financial crisis, and on what ...


January 11, 2010, 6:34 pm, 628422
Paul Krugman's New York Times Magazine article argues for the superiority of Keynesian rather than efficient-markets explanations of...what, exactly? Sometimes his dependent variable seems to be bubbles, other times recessions/depressions. But the topic is supposed to be the financial crisis of 2008. How does Keynesianism explain that?



More Entries